OK Planning Update: Oklahoma Health Care Authority Enforcing Income Cap for Institutionalized Individuals

Trask v. McCarthy: Why Medicaid Planners Should Appeal in the Face of Denial

  Krause Financial Services has recently learned of a case out of Ohio involving Medicaid planning and the use of an annuity.  In 2014, an institutionalized spouse was subjected to a divestment penalty period after his wife, the community spouse, purchased an annuity they believed to be Medicaid compliant.  The couple decided to appeal the … Continued

New Possibilities for New Jersey Medicaid Compliant Annuities

  In the past, Krause Financial Services and its New Jersey colleagues were faced with the lack of short-term Medicaid Compliant Annuities (“MCA”) being funded with tax-qualified/IRA funds.  Previously, the shortest tax-qualified annuity term KFS was able to offer in New Jersey was 60 months.  This posed a lot of concern with New Jersey attorneys … Continued

Ohio Update: Troubling News Out of Cuyahoga County

  At the end of this past March, KFS Benefits Planner Stuart Otto had the pleasure of attending the Ohio Elder Law Institute in Columbus, OH.  During his time there, Stuart learned of a pressing issue out of Cuyahoga County regarding the definition of “actuarially sound” for Medicaid Compliant Annuities (“MCA”).  In addition to this … Continued

Maine Update: “Name on the Check” Rule Victory!

We have an important Maine Name on the Check rule update! We are pleased to announce that Maine is the most recent state to honor the “Name on the Check” rule! We have received word that the “Name on the Check” rule has been successfully litigated in Maine.  Because of this victory, the “Name on the Check” rule now appears to … Continued

Ohio Update: Partial Cures No Longer Permissible

  If you’re an Ohio practitioner, you’re probably aware that as of January 1, 2016, Ohio no longer permits a partial cure of transferred assets.  Prior to January 1, 2016, when a portion of an improperly transferred asset was returned, the returned portion was considered an available resource beginning in the month the asset was … Continued

“Name on the Check” Rule: Looks Good in Wisconsin!

  For those of you not familiar with the term “Name on the Check” rule, it is a common guideline used by Medicaid in determining who owns income. If a check is made payable to a particular individual, that individual is considered the owner of the income. This guideline can be quite advantageous in cases involving … Continued

Case Study: Tax-Deferred Annuities & Texas Medicaid Planning

Have you heard about Texas’ take on tax-deferred annuities in Medicaid Planning?   In November, we published a blog, highlighting a recent change in the Texas Medicaid Agency’s interpretation of the word annuity, and detailed how – pursuant to the Texas Medicaid Handbook – your clients’ retirement assets may be transferred to a tax-deferred annuity (TDA), while still … Continued

Arkansas Following Suit: Is Hughes v. McCarthy the New Trend?

Spousal Medicaid Annuities No Longer Have Beneficiary Requirements Arkansas is the second state* to jump on board with the Hughes v. McCarthy  U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decision, ruling that an annuity purchased for the sole benefit of the community spouse (CS) does not need to follow the beneficiary requirements. As you might recall, … Continued

H.R. 1771: Spousal Annuities in Medicaid Planning

  You might recall a letter the National Association of State Medicaid Directors (“NASMD”) wrote to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) back in March of 2010. The letter was regarding the use of short-term annuities in spousal planning, particularly on the technique where community spouses were using the annuities to return the … Continued